Daily mail Registration Page Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Web Security Problem

Daily mail Registration Page Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Web Security Problem

 

 

Website Description:
“The Daily Mail is a British daily middle-market tabloid newspaper owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust. First published in 1896 by Lord Northcliffe, it is the United Kingdom’s second biggest-selling daily newspaper after The Sun. Its sister paper The Mail on Sunday was launched in 1982. Scottish and Irish editions of the daily paper were launched in 1947 and 2006 respectively. The Daily Mail was Britain’s first daily newspaper aimed at the newly-literate “lower-middle class market resulting from mass education, combining a low retail price with plenty of competitions, prizes and promotional gimmicks”, and was the first British paper to sell a million copies a day. It was at the outset a newspaper for women, the first to provide features especially for them, and as of the second-half of 2013 had a 54.77% female readership, the only British newspaper whose female readers constitute more than 50% of its demographic. It had an average daily circulation of 1,708,006 copies in March 2014. Between July and December 2013 it had an average daily readership of approximately 3.951 million, of whom approximately 2.503 million were in the ABC1 demographic and 1.448 million in the C2DE demographic. Its website has more than 100 million unique visitors per month.” (Wikipedia)

One of its website’s Alexa rank is 93 on January 01 2015. The website is one of the most popular websites in the United Kingdom.

 

 

 

(1) Vulnerability Description:
Daily online websites have a cyber security problem. Hacker can exploit it by Open Redirect (Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards) attacks. During the tests, all Daily mail websites (Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday & Metro media group) use the same mechanism. These websites include dailymail.co.uk, thisismoney.co.uk, and mailonsunday.co.uk.

 

 

Google Dork:
“Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group”

 

The vulnerability occurs at “&targetUrl” parameter in “logout.html?” page, i.e.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fgoogle.com

 

dailymail_1

 

 thisismoney_1

 

(2.1) Use the following tests to illustrate the scenario painted above.
The redirected webpage address is “http://diebiyi.com/articles“. Can suppose that this webpage is malicious.

 

Vulnerable URLs:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdailymail.co.uk
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fhao123.com/
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fpinterest.com

 

POC Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdiebiyi.com/articles
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdiebiyi.com/articles
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/registration/logout.html?targetUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdiebiyi.com/articles

 

 

POC Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU-HJGe5BWE&feature=youtu.be

 

Blog Detail:
http://tetraph.com/security/website-test/daily-mail-url-redirection/
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2015/10/daily-mail-registration-page.html
https://vulnerabilitypost.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/daily-mail-open-redirect/

 

 

(2.2) The program code flaw can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on Microsoft IE (9 9.0.8112.16421) of Windows 8, Mozilla Firefox (37.0.2) & Google Chromium 42.0.2311 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04.2),and Apple Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X v10.9 Mavericks.

These bugs were found by using URFDS (Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Detection System).

 

 

 

(2) Description of Open Redirect:
Here is the description of Open Redirect: “A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks. An http parameter may contain a URL value and could cause the web application to redirect the request to the specified URL. By modifying the URL value to a malicious site, an attacker may successfully launch a phishing scam and steal user credentials. Because the server name in the modified link is identical to the original site, phishing attempts have a more trustworthy appearance.” (From CWE)

 

 

 

(3) Vulnerability Disclosure:
These vulnerabilities have not been patched.

 

 

Discover and Reporter:
Wang Jing, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. (@justqdjing)
http://www.tetraph.com/wangjing

 

 

 

 

Reference:
https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2015110028
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2015/11/daily-mail-open-redirect.html
http://itinfotech.tumblr.com/post/132726134291/ithut-daily-mail-registration-page-unvalidated
http://itsecurity.lofter.com/post/1cfbf9e7_8d45d37
https://inzeed.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/daily-mail-registration-page
http://webtechhut.blogspot.com/2015/11/daily-mail-registration-page.html
https://community.webroot.com/t5/Security-Industry-News/The-Telegraph-and-Daily-Mail
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.fulldisclosure/2643|
http://lists.openwall.net/full-disclosure/2015/11/03/8

 

Advertisements

Daily Mail Online Website XSS Cyber Security Zero-Day Vulnerability

Daily Mail Online Website XSS Cyber Security Zero-Day Vulnerability



Website Description:
“The Daily Mail is a British daily middle-market tabloid newspaper owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust. First published in 1896 by Lord Northcliffe, it is the United Kingdom’s second biggest-selling daily newspaper after The Sun. Its sister paper The Mail on Sunday was launched in 1982. Scottish and Irish editions of the daily paper were launched in 1947 and 2006 respectively. The Daily Mail was Britain’s first daily newspaper aimed at the newly-literate “lower-middle class market resulting from mass education, combining a low retail price with plenty of competitions, prizes and promotional gimmicks”, and was the first British paper to sell a million copies a day. It was at the outset a newspaper for women, the first to provide features especially for them, and as of the second-half of 2013 had a 54.77% female readership, the only British newspaper whose female readers constitute more than 50% of its demographic. It had an average daily circulation of 1,708,006 copies in March 2014. Between July and December 2013 it had an average daily readership of approximately 3.951 million, of whom approximately 2.503 million were in the ABC1 demographic and 1.448 million in the C2DE demographic. Its website has more than 100 million unique visitors per month.” (Wikipedia)

 

Domain Name:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

The Alexa rank of it is 93 on January 01 2015. It is one of the most popular websites in the United Kingdom.

 

dailymail_uk_xss

 

(1) Vulnerability description:

Daily Mail has a security problem. Criminals can exploit it by XSS attacks.

The vulnerability occurs at “reportAbuseInComment.html?” page with “&commentId” parameter, i.e.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=346288&commentId=877038

 

 

POC Code:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/reportAbuseInComment.html?articleId=346288&commentId=”><img src=x onerror=prompt(‘justqdjing’)>

The vulnerability can be attacked without user log in. Tests were performed on Mozilla Firefox (34.0) in Ubuntu (14.04) and Microsoft IE (9.0.15) in Windows 7.

 

Poc Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oig-ZrlJDf8&feature=youtu.be

 

Blog Detail:
http://tetraph.com/security/web-security/daily-mail-xss-bug/
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2015/10/daily-mail-online-website-xss-cyber.html
https://vulnerabilitypost.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/daily-mail-xss/

 
 
 
 

 

(2) What is XSS?

“Cross-site scripting (XSS) is a type of computer security vulnerability typically found in web applications. XSS enables attackers to inject client-side script into web pages viewed by other users. A cross-site scripting vulnerability may be used by attackers to bypass access controls such as the same-origin policy. Cross-site scripting carried out on websites accounted for roughly 84% of all security vulnerabilities documented by Symantec as of 2007. Their effect may range from a petty nuisance to a significant security risk, depending on the sensitivity of the data handled by the vulnerable site and the nature of any security mitigation implemented by the site’s owner.” (Wikipedia)

 

 

 

(3) Vulnerability Disclosure:

This vulnerability has been patched.

 

 

 

Discoved and Disclosured By:
Wang Jing, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. (@justqdjing)
http://www.tetraph.com/wangjing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference:
https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/134189/Daily-Mail-Unvalidated-Redirect
http://news.softpedia.com/news/the-telegraph-and-daily-mail-fix-xss
https://www.secnews.gr/dailymail_open_redirect_bug
http://whitehatview.tumblr.com/post/132726489926/daily-mail-xss
http://sys-secure.es/daily-mail-registration-page-unvalidated
http://itsecuritynews.info/tag/jing-wang/
http://itsecurity.lofter.com/post/1cfbf9e7_8d45d6b
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2015/11/daily-mail-xss.html
https://computertechhut.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/daily-mail-xss/
http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=144651836427184&w=4

Sohu OAuth 2.0 Service Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)

Screenshot from 2015-06-28 21:09:09

 

Sohu OAuth 2.0 Service Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)




(1) Domain:

sohu.com

 

“Sohu, Inc. (Chinese: 搜狐; pinyin: Sōuhú; literally: “Search-fox”) is a Chinese Internet company headquartered in the Sohu Internet Plaza in Haidian District, Beijing. This company and its subsidiaries offer advertising, a search engine, on-line multiplayer gaming and other services. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, Sohu Inc.’s revenues increased 41% to $188.9M. Net income increased 31% to $35M. Sohu was ranked as the world’s 3rd and 12th fastest growing company by Fortune in 2009 and 2010 respectively. As of August 2011, Sohu is the 44th overall in Alexa’s internet rankings.” (Wikipedia)

 

 

 

 

(2) Vulnerability Description:

Sohu web application has a computer security problem. Hacker can exploit it by Covert Redirect cyber attacks. 



The vulnerabilities can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on Microsoft IE (10.0.9200.16750) of Windows 8, Mozilla Firefox (34.0) & Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04),Apple Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X Lion 10.7. 

 

 

 

 

(2.1) Vulnerability Detail:

Sohu’s OAuth 2.0 system is susceptible to Attacks. More specifically, the authentication of parameter “&redirct_uri” in OAuth 2.0 system is insufficient. It can be misused to design Open Redirect Attacks to Sohu.

 

At the same time, it can be used to collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users by using the following parameters (sensitive information is contained in HTTP header.),

“&response_type”=sensitive_info,token…

“&scope”=get_user_info%2Cadd_share…

 

It increases the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks to third-party websites, too.

 

 

Before acceptance of third-party application:

When a logged-in Sohu user clicks the URL ([1]) above, he/she will be asked for consent as in whether to allow a third-party website to receive his/her information. If the user clicks OK, he/she will be then redirected to the URL assigned to the parameter “&redirect_uri”.

 

If a user has not logged onto Sohu and clicks the URL ([1]) above, the same situation will happen upon login.

 

 

After acceptance of third-party application:

A logged-in Sohu user would no longer be asked for consent and could be redirected to a webpage controlled by the attacker when he/she clicks the URL ([1]).

 

For a user who has not logged in, the attack could still be completed after a pop-up page that prompts him/her to log in.

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Sohu would normally allow all the URLs that belong to the domain of an authorized third-party website. However, these URLs could be prone to manipulation. For example, the “&redirect_uri” parameter in the URLs is supposed to be set by the third-party websites, but an attacker could change its value to make Attacks.

 

Hence, a user could be redirected from Sohu to a vulnerable URL in that domain first and later be redirected from this vulnerable site to a malicious site unwillingly. This is as if the user is redirected from Sohu directly. The number of Sohu’s OAuth 2.0 client websites is so huge that such Attacks could be commonplace.

 

Before acceptance of the third-party application, Sohu’s OAuth 2.0 system makes the redirects appear more trustworthy and could potentially increase the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks of third-party website.

 

Once the user accepts the application, the attackers could completely bypass Sohu’s authentication system and attack more easily.

 

 

 

(2.2) Used one of webpages for the following tests. The webpage is “http://essayjeanslike.lofter.com/“. Can suppose it is malicious and contains code that collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users.

 

 

POC Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1XW31s92qA




Blog Detail:
http://tetraph.blogspot.com/2014/05/sohus-oauth-20-covert-redirect.html







(3) What is Covert Redirect? 

Covert Redirect is a class of security bugs disclosed in May 2014. It is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value without sufficient validation. This often makes use of Open Redirect and XSS (Cross-site Scripting) vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Covert Redirect is also related to single sign-on, such as OAuth and OpenID. Hacker may use it to steal users’ sensitive information. Almost all OAuth 2.0 and OpenID providers worldwide are affected. Covert Redirect can work together with CSRF (Cross-site Request Forgery) as well. 

 

 

 

Discover and Reporter:
Jing Wang, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. 
(@justqdjing)
http://tetraph.com/wangjing/








Related Articles:
http://tetraph.com/security/covert-redirect/sohus-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect
https://inzeed.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/sohu-exploit/
https://twitter.com/buttercarrot/status/558906629056249856
http://diebiyi.com/articles/security/covert-redirect/sohus-oauth-bug
http://russiapost.blogspot.com/2014/07/sohu-hacking.html
http://shellmantis.tumblr.com/post/119492886806/securitypost
http://xingzhehong.lofter.com/post/1cfd0db2_706af13
https://itinfotechnology.wordpress.com/2014/07/07/sohu-attack/
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/covert-redirect/sohus-oauth-2-0
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/23460305120144714756937/
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2014/08/sohu-service-attack.html

 

 

 

===========

 

 

搜狐 网站 OAuth 2.0 隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 网络安全漏洞 (信息泄漏 & 公开重定向) 





(1) 域名:
sohu.com



” 搜狐(NASDAQ:SOHU),是一家互联网中文门户网站。1995年,搜狐创始人张朝阳从美国麻省理工学院毕业回到中国,利用风险投资创建了爱特信信 息技术有限公司,1998年正式推出搜狐网。2000年,搜狐在美国纳斯达克证券市场上市。搜狐开发的产品有搜狗拼音输入法、搜狗五笔输入法、搜狗音乐 盒、搜狗浏览器、搜狐彩电、独立的搜索引擎搜狗和网游门户畅游。搜狐是2008年北京奥林匹克运动会唯一的互联网赞助商,也是奥林匹克运动会历史上第一个 互联网内容的赞助商。” (百度百科)







(2) 漏洞描述:

搜狐 网站有有一个计算机安全问题,黑客可以对它进行隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 网络攻击。

 

 

这 个漏洞不需要用户登录,测试是基于微软 Windows 8 的 IE (10.0.9200.16750); Ubuntu (14.04) 的 Mozilla 火狐 (Firefox 34.0) 和 谷歌 Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0; 以及苹果 OS X Lion 10.7 的 Safari 6.16。




 


(2.1) 漏洞细节:

Sohu 的 OAuth 2.0 系统可能遭到攻击。更确切地说, Sohu 对 OAuth 2.0 系统的 parameter “&redirect_uri“ 验证不够充分。可以用来构造对 Sohu 的 URL跳转 攻击。

 

 

与此同时,这个漏洞可以用下面的参数来收集第三方 App 和 用户 的敏感信息(敏感信息包含在 HTTP header里),

“&response_type”=sensitive_info,token,code…

“&scope”=email,name…

 

 

它也增加了对第三方网站 URL跳转 攻击的成功率。

 

 

漏洞地点 “/oauth2/authorize?”,参数”&redirect_uri”, e.g.

https://api.t.sohu.com/oauth2/authorize?client_id=TP4vefRdCFUEFhrNpMnQ&scope=basic&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.cn%2Fsitecb%2Fsohu.do&state=http://my.xuan.news.cn/main.do__20 [1]

 

 

 

同意三方 App 前:

当一个已经登录的 Sohu 用户点击上面的 URL ([1]), 对话框会询问他是否接受第三方 App 接收他的信息。如果同意,他会被跳转到 参数 “&redirect_uri” 的 URL。

 

 

如果没有登录的 Sohu 用户点击 URL ([1]), 他登录后会发生同样的事情。

 

 

 

同意三方 App 后:

已经登录的 Sohu 用户 不会再被询问是否接受 三方 App。当他点击 URL ([1]) 时,他会被直接跳转到攻击者控制的页面。

 

 

如果 Sohu 用户没有登录,攻击依然可以在要求他登录的Sohu的对话框被确认后完成(这个过程不会提示任何和三方 App 有关的内容)。

 

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Sohu 一般会允许属于已被验证过得三方 App domain 的所有 URLs。 然而,这些 URLs 可以被操控。比如,参数 “&redirect_uri” 是被三方 App 设置的,但攻击者可以修改此参数的值。

 

 

因此,Sohu 用户意识不到他会被先从 Sohu 跳转到第三方 App 的网页,然后从此网页跳转到有害的网页。这与从 Sohu 直接跳转到有害网页是一样的。

 

 

因为 Sohu 的 OAuth 2.0 客户很多,这样的攻击可以很常见。

 

 

在同意三方 App 之前,Sohu 的 OAuth 2.0 让用户更容易相信被跳转的页面是安全的。这增加了三方 App 被 URL跳转 攻击的成功率。

 

 

同意三方 App 后, 攻击者可以完全绕过 Sohu 的 URL跳转 验证系统。

 

 

用了一个页面进行了测试, 页面是 “http://essayjeanslike.lofter.com/“. 可以假定它是有害的,并且含有收集三方 App 和用户敏感信息的 code。

 

 

Sohu 与 news.cn 有关的有漏洞的 URL:
https://api.t.sohu.com/oauth2/authorize?client_id=TP4vefRdCFUEFhrNpMnQ&scope=basic&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flogin.home.news.cn%2Fcb%2Fsohu.do&state=http://my.xuan.news.cn/main.do__20

 

 

POC (我们可以在news.cn domain 内随便修改”redirect_uri”的值):
https://api.t.sohu.com/oauth2/authorize?client_id=TP4vefRdCFUEFhrNpMnQ&scope=basic&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flogin.home.news.cn%2Fcb%2Fsohu.do&state=http://my.xuan.news.cn/main.do__20

 

 

POC 视频:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1XW31s92qA




博客细节:
http://tetraph.blogspot.com/2014/05/sohus-oauth-20-covert-redirect.html

 





(3) 什么是隐蔽重定向? 

隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 是一个计算机网络安全漏洞。这个漏洞发布于 2014年5月。漏洞成因是网络应用软件对跳转到合作者的跳转没有充分过滤。这个漏洞经常利用第三方网站 (包括合作网站) 的公开重定向 (Open Redirect) 或者 跨站脚本漏洞 (XSS – Cross-site Scripting) 问题。

 

隐蔽重定向也对单点登录 (single sign-on) 有影响。最初发布的是对两款常用登录软件 OAuth 2.0 和 OpenID 的影响。黑客可以利用真实的网站进行网络钓鱼,从而窃取用户敏感信息。几乎所用提供 OAuth 2.0 和 OpenID 服务的网站都被影响。隐蔽重定向也可以和 跨站请求伪造 (CSRF – Cross-site Request Forgery) 一起利用。



Mail.ru Online Service OAuth 2.0 Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)

mail-ru_1882101c

 

Mail.ru Online Service OAuth 2.0 Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)

 

(1) Domain:
mail.ru

 

 

“Mail.Ru Group (London Stock Exchange listed since November 5, 2010) is a Russian Internet company. It was started in 1998 as an e-mail service and went on to become a major corporate figure in the Russian-speaking segment of the Internet. As of 2013, according to comScore, websites owned by Mail.ru collectively had the largest audience in Russia and captured the most screen time. Mail.Ru’s sites reach approximately 86% of Russian Internet users on a monthly basis and the company is in the top 5 of largest Internet companies, based on the number of total pages viewed. Mail.ru controls the 3 largest Russian social networking sites. It operates the second and third most popular Russian social networking sites, Odnoklassniki and Moy Mir, respectively. Mail.ru holds 100% of shares of Russia’s most popular social network VKontakte and minority stakes in Qiwi, formerly OE Investments (15.04%). It also operates two instant messaging networks (Mail.Ru Agent and ICQ), an e-mail service and Internet portal Mail.ru, as well as a number of online games.” (Wikipedia)

 

 

“Mail.Ru — крупный коммуникационный портал российского Интернета, ежемесячная аудитория которого по данным на октябрь 2012 года превышает 31,9 млн человек. Ресурс занимает 52-е место по популярности в мире и 5-е — в России. Число работников составляет 2800 человек. Ресурс принадлежит инвестиционной группе Mail.Ru Group.” (Ru.Wikipedia)

 

 

 

 

(2) Vulnerability Description:

Mail.ru web application has a computer security problem. Hacker can exploit it by Covert Redirect cyber attacks.

 

The vulnerabilities can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on Microsoft IE (10.0.9200.16750) of Windows 8, Mozilla Firefox (34.0) & Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04),Apple Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X Lion 10.7.

 

 


(2.1) Vulnerability Detail:

Mail.Ru’s OAuth system is susceptible to Attacks. More specifically, the authentication of parameter “&redirct_uri” in OAuth system is insufficient. It can be misused to design Open Redirect Attacks to Mail.Ru.

 

At the same time, it can be used to collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users by using the following parameters (sensitive information is contained in HTTP header.),

“&response_type”=code,token…

“&scope”=get_user_info…

 

It increases the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks to third-party websites, too.

 

 

The vulnerabilities occurs at page “/oauth/authorize?” with parameter “&redirect_uri”, e.g.
https://connect.mail.ru/oauth/authorize?response_type=token&client_id=667668&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fmy.kp.ru%2Flogin.do%3FreturnUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.tetraph.com%252Fessayjeans%252Fpoems%252Fdistance.html [1]

 

 

Before acceptance of third-party application:

 

When a logged-in Mail.Ru user clicks the URL ([1]) above, he/she will be asked for consent as in whether to allow a third-party website to receive his/her information. If the user clicks OK, he/she will be then redirected to the URL assigned to the parameter “&redirect_uri”.

 

If a user has not logged onto Mail.Ru and clicks the URL ([1]) above, the same situation will happen upon login.

 

After acceptance of third-party application:

 

A logged-in Mail.Ru user would no longer be asked for consent and could be redirected to a webpage controlled by the attacker when he/she clicks the URL ([1]).

 

For a user who has not logged in, the attack could still be completed after a pop-up page that prompts him/her to log in.

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Mail.Ru would normally allow all the URLs that belong to the domain of an authorized third-party website. However, these URLs could be prone to manipulation. For example, the “&redirect_uri” parameter in the URLs is supposed to be set by the third-party websites, but an attacker could change its value to make Attacks.

 

Hence, a user could be redirected from Mail.Ru to a vulnerable URL in that domain first and later be redirected from this vulnerable site to a malicious site unwillingly. This is as if the user is redirected from Mail.Ru directly. The number of Mail.Ru’s OAuth client websites is so huge that such Attacks could be commonplace.

 

Before acceptance of the third-party application, Mail.Ru’s OAuth system makes the redirects appear more trustworthy and could potentially increase the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks of third-party website.

 

Once the user accepts the application, the attackers could completely bypass Mail.Ru’s authentication system and attack more easily.

 

 

 

(2.2) Used one of webpages for the following tests. The webpage is “http://biboying.lofter.com/“. We can suppose it is malicious and contains code that collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users.

 

Below is an example of a vulnerable third-party domain:
kp.ru

 

 

Vulnerable URL in this domain:
http://my.kp.ru/login.do?returnUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fpoems%2Fdistance.html

 

Vulnerable URL from Mail.Ru that is related to kp.ru:
https://connect.mail.ru/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=667668&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fmy.kp.ru%2Flogin%2Fmailru.do%3FreturnUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fizh.kp.ru

 

POC:
https://connect.mail.ru/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=667668&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fmy.kp.ru%2Flogin.do%3FreturnUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.tetraph.com%252Fessayjeans%252Fpoems%252Fdistance.html

 

 

POC Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yEB58S8WBI

 

Blog Detail:
http://tetraph.blogspot.com/2014/05/mailru-oauth-20-covert-redirect.html

 

 

(3) What is Covert Redirect?

Covert Redirect is a class of security bugs disclosed in May 2014. It is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value without sufficient validation. This often makes use of Open Redirect and XSS (Cross-site Scripting) vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

 

Covert Redirect is also related to single sign-on. It is known by its influence on OAuth and OpenID. Hacker may use it to steal users’ sensitive information. Almost all OAuth 2.0 and OpenID providers worldwide are affected. Covert Redirect can work together with CSRF (Cross-site Request Forgery) as well. After Covert Redirect was published, it is kept in some common databases such as SCIP, OSVDB, Bugtraq, and X-Force. Its scipID is 13185, while OSVDB reference number is 106567. Bugtraq ID: 67196. X-Force reference number is 93031.



 

Discover and Reporter:
Wang Jing, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. (@justqdjing)
http://tetraph.com/wangjing/

 

Related Articles:
http://tetraph.com/security/covert-redirect/mail-ru-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect-vulnerability/
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/covert-redirect/mail-ru-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect-vulnerability/
https://twitter.com/essayjeans/status/558974764958486528
https://tetraph.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/mail-ru-security-bugs/
https://computertechhut.wordpress.com/2014/07/05/mail-ru-security-bugs/
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2014/08/mailru-website-attack.html
http://whitehatpost.lofter.com/post/1cc773c8_706b6bf
http://ithut.tumblr.com/post/119493112323/securitypost-sicherheitslucke-in-oauth-2-0-und
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/23460305120144611948109/
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2014/08/mailru-website-attack.html

Alibaba Taobao OAuth 2.0 Service Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)

1688-taobao

 

Alibaba Taobao OAuth 2.0 Service Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)




(1) Domain:
taobao.com

 

 

“Taobao (simplified Chinese: 淘宝网; traditional Chinese: 淘寶網; pinyin: Táobǎo Wǎng; literally: “searching for treasure website”) is a Chinese website for online shopping similar to eBay and Amazon that is operated in China by Alibaba Group. Founded by Alibaba Group on May 10, 2003, Taobao Marketplace facilitates consumer-to-consumer (C2C) retail by providing a platform for small businesses and individual entrepreneurs to open online stores that mainly cater to consumers in Chinese-speaking regions (Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) and also abroad. With around 760 million product listings as of March 2013, Taobao Marketplace is one of the world’s top 10 most visited websites according to Alexa. For the year ended March 31, 2013, the combined gross merchandise volume (GMV) of Taobao Marketplace and Tmall.com exceeded 1 trillion yuan.” (Wikipedia)

 

 

 

 

(2) Vulnerability Description:

Taobao web application has a computer security problem. Hacker can exploit it by Covert Redirect cyber attacks.



The vulnerabilities can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on Microsoft IE (10.0.9200.16750) of Windows 8, Mozilla Firefox (34.0) & Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04),Apple Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X Lion 10.7.

 

 

 

 

(2.1) Vulnerability Detail:

Taobao’s OAuth 2.0 system is susceptible to Attacks. More specifically, the authentication of parameter “&redirct_uri” in OAuth 2.0 system is insufficient. It can be misused to design Open Redirect Attacks to Taobao.

 

At the same time, it can be used to collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users by using the following parameters (sensitive information is contained in HTTP header.),

“&response_type”=sensitive_info,token…

“&scope”=get_user_info%2Cadd_share…

 

It increases the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks to third-party websites, too.

 

The vulnerabilities occurs at page “/authorize?” with parameter “&redirect_uri”, e.g.
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do%3Fbru%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html [1]

 

 

Before acceptance of third-party application:

When a logged-in Taobao user clicks the URL ([1]) above, he/she will be asked for consent as in whether to allow a third-party website to receive his/her information. If the user clicks OK, he/she will be then redirected to the URL assigned to the parameter “&redirect_uri”.

 

If a user has not logged onto Taobao and clicks the URL ([1]) above, the same situation will happen upon login.

 

 

After acceptance of third-party application:

A logged-in Taobao user would no longer be asked for consent and could be redirected to a webpage controlled by the attacker when he/she clicks the URL ([1]).

 

For a user who has not logged in, the attack could still be completed after a pop-up page that prompts him/her to log in.

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Taobao would normally allow all the URLs that belong to the domain of an authorized third-party website. However, these URLs could be prone to manipulation. For example, the “&redirect_uri” parameter in the URLs is supposed to be set by the third-party websites, but an attacker could change its value to make Attacks.

 

Hence, a user could be redirected from Taobao to a vulnerable URL in that domain first and later be redirected from this vulnerable site to a malicious site unwillingly. This is as if the user is redirected from Taobao directly. The number of Taobao’s OAuth 2.0 client websites is so huge that such Attacks could be commonplace.

 

Before acceptance of the third-party application, Taobao’s OAuth 2.0 system makes the redirects appear more trustworthy and could potentially increase the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks of third-party website.

 

Once the user accepts the application, the attackers could completely bypass Taobao’s authentication system and attack more easily.

 

 

 

(2.2) Used one of webpages for the following tests. The webpage is “https://computerpitch.wordpress.com/“. Can suppose it is malicious and contains code that collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users.

 

Below is an example of a vulnerable third-party domain:
sohu.com

 

Vulnerable URL in this domain:
http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do?bru=http%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html

 

Vulnerable URL from Taobao that is related to sohu.com:
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://sohu.com

 

POC:
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do%3Fbru%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html

 

 

 

 

(2.3) The following URLs have the same vulnerabilities.
https://login.taobao.com/member/login.jhtml?sign=8uBo%2FBShyXsFVd4q%2FREkfg%3D%3D&timestamp=2014-03-19+09%3A24%3A22&sub=true&style=mini_top&need_sign=top&full_redirect=true&from=mini_top&from_encoding=utf-8&TPL_redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Foauth.taobao.com%2Fauthorize%3Fstate%3D1%26response_type%3Dcode%26client_id%3D21112101%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.paidai.com%252Fuser%252Foauth_taobao.php

 

 

POC Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZVCZK03-Rw



Blog Detail:
http://tetraph.blogspot.com/2014/05/alibaba-taobao-oauth-20-covert-redirect.html







(3) What is Covert Redirect?

Covert Redirect is a class of security bugs disclosed in May 2014. It is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value without sufficient validation. This often makes use of Open Redirect and XSS (Cross-site Scripting) vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

 

Covert Redirect is also related to single sign-on, such as OAuth and OpenID. Hacker may use it to steal users’ sensitive information. Almost all OAuth 2.0 and OpenID providers worldwide are affected. Covert Redirect can work together with CSRF (Cross-site Request Forgery) as well.



 

Discover and Reporter:
Jing Wang, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.
(@justqdjing)
http://tetraph.com/wangjing/









Related Articles:
http://tetraph.com/security/covert-redirect/alibaba-taobao-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/covert-redirect/alibaba-taobao-bug
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2014/05/alibaba-taobao-service-exploit.html
https://twitter.com/essayjeans/status/558976811573321728
https://webtechwire.wordpress.com/2014/06/06/taobao-vulnerability/
http://inzeed.tumblr.com/post/119493913816/securitypost-itinfotech-continuan-los
http://essayjeans.lofter.com/post/1cc7459a_7069892
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2014/05/alibaba-taobao-service-exploit.html
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/2346030512014463745630/
http://diebiyi.com/articles/security/covert-redirect/alibaba-taobao-oauth-2-0
https://hackertopic.wordpress.com/2014/06/01/alibaba-taobao-bug/

 

 

 

===========

 

 


阿里巴巴 淘宝 网站 OAuth 2.0 隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 网络安全漏洞 (信息泄漏 & 公开重定向)




(1) 域名:

taobao.com



” 淘宝网是亚太地区较大的网络零售商圈,由阿里巴巴集团在2003年5月10日投资创立。淘宝网现在业务跨越C2C(个人对个人)、B2C(商家对个人)两 大部分。截止2014年,淘宝网注册会员超5亿人每天有超过1.2亿的活跃用户,在线商品数达到10亿件,淘宝网和天猫平台的交易额总额超过了1.5万 亿。” (百度百科)







(2) 漏洞描述:

阿里巴巴 淘宝 网站有有一个计算机安全问题,黑客可以对它进行隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 网络攻击。




这 个漏洞不需要用户登录,测试是基于微软 Windows 8 的 IE (10.0.9200.16750); Ubuntu (14.04) 的 Mozilla 火狐 (Firefox 34.0) 和 谷歌 Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0; 以及苹果 OS X Lion 10.7 的 Safari 6.16。




 


(2.1) 漏洞细节:

Taobao 的 OAuth 2.0 系统可能遭到攻击。更确切地说, Taobao 对 OAuth 2.0 系统的 parameter “&redirect_uri“ 验证不够充分。可以用来构造对 Taobao 的 URL跳转 攻击。

 

 

与此同时,这个漏洞可以用下面的参数来收集第三方 App 和 用户 的敏感信息(敏感信息包含在 HTTP header里),

“&response_type”=sensitive_info,token,code…

“&scope”=get_user_info,email…

 

 

它也增加了对第三方网站 URL跳转 攻击的成功率。

 

 

漏洞地点 “/authorize?”,参数”&redirect_uri”, e.g.
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do%3Fbru%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html [1]

 

 

 

同意三方 App 前:

当一个已经登录的 Taobao 用户点击上面的 URL ([1]), 对话框会询问他是否接受第三方 App 接收他的信息。如果同意,他会被跳转到 参数 “&redirect_uri” 的 URL。

 

 

如果没有登录的Taobao 用户点击 URL ([1]), 他登录后会发生同样的事情。

 

 

 

同意三方 App 后:

已经登录的 Taobao 用户 不会再被询问是否接受 三方 App。当他点击 URL ([1]) 时,他会被直接跳转到攻击者控制的页面。

 

 

如果 Taobao 用户没有登录,攻击依然可以在要求他登录的Taobao的对话框被确认后完成(这个过程不会提示任何和三方 App 有关的内容)。

 

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Taobao 一般会允许属于已被验证过得三方 App domain 的所有 URLs。 然而,这些 URLs 可以被操控。比如,参数 “&redirect_uri” 是被三方 App 设置的,但攻击者可以修改此参数的值。

 

 

因此,Taobao 用户意识不到他会被先从 Taobao 跳转到第三方 App 的网页,然后从此网页跳转到有害的网页。这与从 Taobao 直接跳转到有害网页是一样的。

 

 

因为 Taobao 的 OAuth 2.0 客户很多,这样的攻击可以很常见。

 

 

在同意三方 App 之前,Taobao 的 OAuth 2.0 让用户更容易相信被跳转的页面是安全的。这增加了三方 App 被 URL跳转 攻击的成功率。

 

 

同意三方 App 后, 攻击者可以完全绕过 Taobao 的 URL跳转 验证系统。

 

 

 

 

(2.2) 用了一个页面进行了测试, 页面是 “http://lifegreen.lofter.com/“. 可以假定它是有害的,并且含有收集三方 App 和用户敏感信息的 code。

 

 

下面是一个有漏洞的三方 domain:
sohu.com

 

 

这个 domain 有漏洞的 URL:
http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do?bru=http%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html

 

 

Taobao 与 sohu.com 有关的有漏洞的 URL:
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://sohu.com

 

 

 

POC:
https://oauth.taobao.com/authorize?client_id=21263967&response_type=code&state=O2CRSF7bdf17633d9f4934bb7f4e937eef6d59&redirect_uri=http://store.tv.sohu.com/web/login.do%3Fbru%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fseasons%2F%25E7%25A5%25AD%25E6%2598%25A5.html

 



(3) 什么是隐蔽重定向?

隐蔽重定向 (Covert Redirect) 是一个计算机网络安全漏洞。这个漏洞发布于 2014年5月。漏洞成因是网络应用软件对跳转到合作者的跳转没有充分过滤。这个漏洞经常利用第三方网站 (包括合作网站) 的公开重定向 (Open Redirect) 或者 跨站脚本漏洞 (XSS – Cross-site Scripting) 问题。

隐蔽重定向也对单点登录 (single sign-on) 有影响。最初发布的是对两款常用登录软件 OAuth 2.0 和 OpenID 的影响。黑客可以利用真实的网站进行网络钓鱼,从而窃取用户敏感信息。几乎所用提供 OAuth 2.0 和 OpenID 服务的网站都被影响。隐蔽重定向也可以和 跨站请求伪造 (CSRF – Cross-site Request Forgery) 一起利用。







Facebook OAuth 2.0 Covert Redirect Vulnerability based on Ask.com (Information Leakage and URL Redirect)

facebook-jpg

 

 

Facebook OAuth 2.0 Service Covert Redirect Web Security Bugs Based on Ask.com (Information Leakage & Open Redirect)



(1) Domain:
facebook.com

 

“Facebook had over 1.44 billion monthly active users as of March 2015. Because of the large volume of data users submit to the service, Facebook has come under scrutiny for their privacy policies. Facebook, Inc. held its initial public offering in February 2012 and began selling stock to the public three months later, reaching an original peak market capitalization of $104 billion. As of February 2015 Facebook reached a market capitalization of $212 Billion.” (Wikipedia)

 

 

 

(2) Vulnerability Description:

Facebook web application has a computer security problem. Hacker can exploit it by Covert Redirect cyber attacks. 



The vulnerabilities can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on Microsoft IE (10.0.9200.16750) of Windows 8, Mozilla Firefox (34.0) & Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04),Apple Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X Lion 10.7. 

 
 
 

 


(2.1) Vulnerability Description:

Facebook’s SSO system is susceptible to Attacks. More specifically, the authentication of parameter “&redirct_uri” in SSO system is insufficient. It can be misused to design Open Redirect Attacks to Facebook.At the same time, it can be used to collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users by using the following parameters,

“&response_type”=sensitive_info,token…

“&scope”=email,user_birthday,user_likes.­..

 

 

It increases the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks to third-party websites, too.

 

The vulnerabilities occurs at page “/dialog/oauth?” with parameter “&redirect_uri”, e.g.
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?client_id=152973104736490&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwzus.ask.com%2Fr%3Ft%3Dp%26u%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.tetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fpoems%2Fdistance.html%3F&response_type=code&scope=email%2cuser_location%2cuser_birthday&display=popup [1]

 

 

Before acceptance of third-party application:

 

When a logged-in Facebook user clicks the URL ([1]) above, he/she will be asked for consent as in whether to allow a third-party website to receive his/her information. If the user clicks OK, he/she will be then redirected to the URL assigned to the parameter “&redirect_uri”.

 

If a user has not logged onto Facebook and clicks the URL ([1]) above, the same situation will happen upon login.

 

After acceptance of third-party application:

 

A logged-in Facebook user would no longer be asked for consent and could be redirected to a webpage controlled by the attacker when he/she clicks the URL ([1]).

 

For a user who has not logged in, the attack could still be completed after a pop-up page that prompts him/her to log in.

 

 

 

 

(2.1.1) Facebook would normally allow all the URLs that belong to the domain of an authorized third-party website. However, these URLs could be prone to manipulation. For example, the “&redirect_uri” parameter in the URLs is supposed to be set by the third-party websites, but an attacker could change its value to make Attacks.

 

Hence, a user could be redirected from Facebook to a vulnerable URL in that domain first and later be redirected from this vulnerable site to a malicious site unwillingly. This is as if the user is redirected from Facebook directly. The number of Facebook’s SSO client websites is so huge that such Attacks could be commonplace.

 

Before acceptance of the third-party application, Facebook’s SSO system makes the redirects appear more trustworthy and could potentially increase the likelihood of successful Open Redirect Attacks of third-party website.

 

Once the user accepts the application, the attackers could completely bypass Facebook’s authentication system and attack more easily.

 

It might be of Facebook’s interest to patch up against such attacks.

 

 

 

 

(2.2) Used one of webpages for the following tests. The webpage is “http://www.diebiyi.com/articles“. We can suppose it is malicious and contains code that collect sensitive information of both third-party app and users.

 

Below is an example of a vulnerable third-party domain:
ask.com

 

 

Vulnerable URL in this domain:
http://wzap.ask.com/r?t=v&d=im&u=http%3A%2F%2Ftetraph.com

 

Vulnerable URL from Facebook that is related to ask.com:
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?client_id=152973104736490&redirect_uri=https%3a%2f%2fsocial.ask.com%2fGS%2fGSLogin.aspx%3fst%3dzNQz0TjIZd42P_zI5MUVw5WtCHw7EDMc1YEjBVuz3bU.&response_type=code&scope=email%2cuser_location%2cuser_birthday&display=popup

 

POC:
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?client_id=152973104736490&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwzus.ask.com%2Fr%3Ft%3Dp%26u%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.tetraph.com%2Fessayjeans%2Fpoems%2Fdistance.html%3F&response_type=code&scope=email%2cuser_location%2cuser_birthday&display=popup

 

 

 

 

(2.3) The following URLs have the same vulnerabilities.
https://m.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fm.espn.go.com%2Fwireless%2Fconnect&scope=email%2Cuser_birthday%2Cuser_likes&client_id=116656161708917

https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/authorize?client_id=116656161708917&redirect_uri=http://m.espn.go.com/wireless/connect&display=touch&scope=email,user_birthday,user_likes

http://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=180444840287&link=http://www.theguardian.com/money/2007/apr/21/creditcards.debt&display=popup&redirect_uri=http://gu-social-share-experiments.theguardian.com&show_error=false&ref=desktop

https://api.instagram.com/oauth/authorize/?client_id=28ad60e4d0b14b5c8bd87099e53feaef&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Ffollowgram.me%2Flogin&response_type=code&scope=likes+comments+relationships&display=touch

 

 


POC Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2-2Scp0pbs



 

Blog Detail:
http://www.tetraph.com/blog/covert-redirect/facebook-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect-vulnerability-based-on-ask-com-information-leakage-and-url-redirect/




 

(3) What is Covert Redirect? 

Covert Redirect is a class of security bugs disclosed in May 2014. It is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value without sufficient validation. This often makes use of Open Redirect and XSS (Cross-site Scripting) vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

 
 

Covert Redirect is also related to single sign-on. It is known by its influence on OAuth and OpenID. Hacker may use it to steal users’ sensitive information. Almost all OAuth 2.0 and OpenID providers worldwide are affected. Covert Redirect can work together with CSRF (Cross-site Request Forgery) as well. 

 
 
 
 



 

Discover and Reporter:
Wang Jing, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. 
(@justqdjing)
http://tetraph.com/wangjing/










Related Articles:
http://tetraph.com/security/covert-redirect/facebook-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect-vulnerability-based-on-ask-com-information-leakage-and-url-redirect/
https://twitter.com/tetraphibious/status/559169008889389056
http://tetraph.blogspot.com/2014/05/hack-facebook-account-based-on-oauth-20.html
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/23460305120144210374933/
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2014/09/facebook-bug.html
http://webcabinet.tumblr.com/post/120699361942/whitehatview-internet-users-threatened-by-new
http://webtech.lofter.com/post/1cd3e0d3_72e61df
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/covert-redirect/facebook-oauth-2-0-covert-redirect-vulnerability-based-on-ask-com-information-leakage-and-url-redirect/